Libyan Embassy attack is an act of warfare.
Whether it leads to war is another matter. Have they forgotten about 2000 or was it different ? Should Trump be arrested for negligent homicide? The United States Faces Interesting Times, Russian S-400 Anti-aircraft Systems Turning Heads. This is also the same woman who supported the putsch against President Yanukovich and who has continued to support the war crimes committed against the populations of east Ukraine by the Poroshenko junta in Kiev ever since. But the sharp words of the German Chancellor to President Putin when she went to Moscow to lay a wreath the day after the Victory Parade prove the opposite is true. For a country to attack another country's embassy within their own borders is the diplomatic equivalent of a gang-rape. Christopher Black is an international criminal lawyer based in Toronto, he is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada and he is known for a number of high-profile cases involving human rights and war crimes, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”. This page was generated at 04:23 AM.
You can sign in to vote the answer. Of course, the host nation won't consider any violence on their part acceptable, but that's just too bad. It is most certainly an act of war.
It is an act of war. Still have questions? Where's the "ShaneFalco is an insufferable troll who should be perma-banned" option?
It was time for something different.
Well, everyone who is not blind, deaf and dumb knows it is the United States of America and its lieutenants in crime who are engaged in the war against Syria; Britain, France, Canada, Jordan, Turkey, Israel and Saudi Arabia.
It issued statements condemning the attacks while at the same time supporting those who carried them out. They do have certain rules of engagement. Let’s examine what an act of terrorism is. The insults go with the military and economic pressure. It is an attack on the foreign state itself and therefore is an act of war … As President Obama was walking away after giving his statement on Libya, Fox Noise reporter Ed Henry yelled the question "Was this an act of war?"
0. An attack on a military post or an attack on a military unit are not acts of terrorism, but are acts of war. The timing of the shelling of the Russian embassy after these meetings cannot be merely coincidence coming right after them and coinciding with the Chinese-Russian naval drills in the Mediterranean and the attempt by the NATO pact to overthrow the government of Macedonia in order to disrupt the South Stream gas pipeline project.
They can't randomly and indiscriminately kill everyone in their path. By international law, the host country is responsible for the safety and security of foreign embassies within its borders. The International Criminal Court has no jurisdiction and is a tool of the west in any event. You are just some shankvolley wankers. Her comments, downplayed in Russia but amplified in the American press, were a deep insult coming from the leader of the nation that had destroyed Russia in World War II and which supported fascist formations during the breakup of Yugoslavia and viciously bombed that country in 1999.
apparently not because an american embassy was bombed under the carter administration and the clinton administration and neither did anything. How do you think about the answers? We already tried the 'fly in billions in unmarked cash to say sorry' approach.
The attack on the consulate is a violation of international law and constitutes an act of aggression under the Rome Statute which states that the crime of aggression includes, Article 8bis(g) “The sending by or on behalf of a State of armed bands, groups, irregulars or mercenaries, which carry out acts of armed force against another State….”. the Embassy is US Sovereign soil an attack on an embassy is an attack on america itself.. Obama will do no longer something, he's in campaign mode and the re-election is more beneficial major. I imagine the marines had different rules of engagements when our embassies in Saigon, Beirut and Teheran were seized. Join Yahoo Answers and get 100 points today. No. Since an embassy is sovereign soil, it is an act of war.
There is no split between the Americans and their puppets. I fear another 4 years of Trump. There is complete accord on the ultimate objective, the subjugation of Russia, There is disagreement on only two things in achieving this objective, strategy and timing. This guy I know always wears this scarf, why? We must hope that Russia and China, with the BRIC countries at their side, can continue to develop another vision of the world in which concern for the other is a natural part of world diplomacy and that, in the meantime, what President Assad of Syria recently referred to as the Axis of Resistance becomes strong enough to defeat the aggression of the dark forces in the west that live only for power, profit and world domination. So DU was this an act of war? The Security Council has been reduced to a carnival sideshow with the psychopathic ravings of the American ambassador the principal attraction. If an embassy is attacked, the host country must defend it, using military or police force as needed.
An embassy is de facto territory of that embassy's country. The Russian Foreign Ministry responded with a statement condemning the attack as an act of “terrorism” and asked the “international community” to respond to the attack and urged “all parties enjoying influence on extremists in Syria to demand they immediately stop such actions.”. Ghengis Kahn is said to have executed people who harmed his ambassors by pouring molten silver into their eyes and ears. The United States has remained silent so far on this bombing but we can expect the same hypocritical statement the State Department made regarding the attack on the Russian embassy in Damascus on November 28, 2013, and another attack in January of this year. The shelling of a foreign embassy by organised armed units engaged in a war is not an act of terrorism either. What will happen if President trump is reelected by a supreme court decision ? It is most certainly an act of war. They issued a statement condemning it but immediately turned around and excused the attack by accusing Russia of moving its forces into Ukraine.